About Me

Name: Sean
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

I'm Proud of My Party Again

Today, the choice of RNC chair has been made, and it's the very exciting, history making, Michael Steel!
 
  • our brand is badly tarnished
  • our princples remain true, valid, and relevant to America's future
  • our strategy has not worked
  • our technology and tactics are badly outdated
  • our fundraising in 2008 was good, not great
  • we must lead with integrity
  • take control of our future in the redistricting process
I'm particularly happy with the acknowledgement of the "tarnished brand", "strategy", and "outdated tech". Also, "we must lead with integrity" addresses the disease of Republicans acting like liberal Democrats -- a destructive practice that definately needs to die.
 
Steele also understands that America is essentially still a conservative country, but that Obama was all too skillful at stealing or nullifying our issues.
 
Clearly, this man gets it, and I'm exceedingly happy with the new leadership.
 
Congratulations Michael Steele, the check's in the mail!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Sorry, I'm with Biden on This

Joe Biden said he'd like to throw Wall Street execs in the brig for rewarding themselves billions in bonuses while asking for public bailout money.
 
So what?

I'd like these dispicable folks thrown in the brig as well. Is such an emotion completely unjustified?
 
First off, not Joe Biden, nor the government, nor myself, are actually going to throw any of these jerks in any actual brig. With his comments, Mr. Biden was merely expressing the outrage us "folks" feel at the audacity of these spoiled, clueless Wall Street hacks to ask us to pay for their stupid bonuses. Vice President Biden's comments were merely an expression of that justified rage.
 
It is in no way the "conservative" thing to defend these Wall Street wankers, because it is public (yours, mine) money that is in question.

If these incompetent execs were not insisting on taxpayer funded bailout money to subsidize their incompetence, then Biden would not be justified.

But that is obviously not the case here.

No conservative should look as though they are sticking up for these entitlement-minded, overpaid failures -- anymore than a conservative would defend an entitlement-minded liberal Democrat.

Personal responsibility should be a conservative value whether you are a regular-joe taxpayer, or Wall Street manager.

No welfare -- corporate or otherwise -- PERIOD!
 
I would have no problem with these losers giving themselves big bonuses -- even for their pathetic failures -- if public money were not in question. But since they are asking you and I to subsidize their stupidity, they are indefensable.
 
While we're at it...YES, let's also throw Chris Dodd and Barney Frank in the brig! I'll agree with Hannity on that one, even though he should not be sticking up for the Wall Street jerks.
 
Mr. Biden --- I generally hate your politics, but on this one at least --- way to go, Joe!     
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Santa Asks Congress for Bailout!

This National Lampoons bit was mentioned on NRP's "Marketplace" this morning. I just finished watching, now sharing...
 
HA!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Congratulations John McCain

John McCain won. Perhaps not the Presidency, barring some miracle, but he has won my heart. Mr. McCain has continued to inspire this 32 year old far more than his younger opponent. Outspent, outgunned, and dealt a lousy political hand, John McCain nevertheless continued to fight. He has kept his word, keeping his end of the deal on campaign financing, even to his detriment. John McCain never went as negative as he reasonably could have, and maybe should have. No matter the result, there is no other candidate on the Republican side who could have fared better in this election.
 
Political courage. Not many in Washington have it, and nobody as much as John McCain. Nobody risked more politically for Immigration Reform than McCain. Nobody was willing to fight as hard for an unpopular troop surge in Iraq than McCain. Today, that policy has led to the triumph of zero US casualties last month. McCain was first to voice "no confidence" in Rumsfeld, standing up to his own President and party, simply because it was right. While other politicians are more than willing to take every sleazy earmark and try to buy off as many voters as possible, McCain has spent his entire career taking zero earmarks. McCain has never voted to raise taxes, preferring instead that congress learn to be better stewards of our money.
 
In Vietnam, John McCain refused early release from the POW camp, strictly honoring "first-in, first-out". If POW's were to be released, the ones who had been there longer should go first. That's what John McCain believed, and so he chose torture for five more years instead of betraying his fellow countrymen. For this, John McCain deserves the title "hero" -- yet, if you tell McCain that he is, he refuses the title. McCain will tell you that the real heroes are those he served with, and that his country saved him -- not the other way around.
 
People will remember and talk about John McCain no matter what the results of this election turn out to be. I will tell the next generation in my family about the McCain family tradition of service, prominent among many examples of this country's greatness. Someday, I'd love to vote for and support another McCain, perhaps one of his two youngest sons. Of course, i'll have to first wait until Jack completes his service as a Naval officer, or Jimmy his service as a US Marine.
 
Thanks for inspiring me to fight, Mr. McCain. Country First.
Tags: wins   mccain  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

McCain 273 Obama 265

PredictNovember.com
 
It's my prediction, and I'm sticking to it. I gave New Mexico to McCain because it's my state, and even though Richardson's the inexplicably popular "GUV" -- I have to have faith that rural reason will triumph over urban Albuquerque/Santa Fe liberal hype. But I did give Obama Colorado and Nevada. Obama also gets Virginia, but in exchange, McCain gets Ohio and Pennsylvania.
 
And if I'm wrong...
 
Congratulations President-Elect Obama, Reid, Frank, PELOSI!

 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Zogby: McCain 48% Obama 47%

Sean Hannity mentioned this at the end of H&C tonight...
 
From Drudge:
ZOGBY SATURDAY: McCain outpolled Obama 48% to 47% in Friday, one day, polling. He is beginning to cut into Obama's lead among independents, is now leading among blue collar voters, has strengthened his lead among investors and among men, and is walloping Obama among NASCAR voters. Joe the Plumber may get his license after all...
 
Stand up and FIGHT!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Unofficial Rural NM Sign Poll

I have a feeling John McCain will win this election in an upset. My feeling is not entirely unreasonable. Part of this is based on McCain's past performance, where he seems to relish being the underdog. There is no doubt McCain has been more fired up lately on the stump. Since "Joe the Plumber", the polls have begun to move away from Obama. 
 
Another reason for my optimistic view has to do with what I see every day in my eastern New Mexico hometown. Nearly 20-to-1, I see McCain-Palin signs in every area of town. While it's true that our side of the state is solid Republican, and it went solid for Bush, and even New Mexico's most prominent Democrats have trouble in our area -- I still see far more McCain-Palin signs than I remember seeing Bush signs four years ago. That ratio, in my estimation, is about 20-to-10 McCain '08 to Bush '04. Indeed, there are at least twice as many McCain-Palin signs than there were Bush signs four years ago. This, in spite of Obama's condescending distortions vastly outnumbering McCain ads on the airwaves. On this side of the state, it seems, whenever another pretentious Obama ad airs, another MCCAIN sign goes up!

So while the media likes to portray all of the excitement and involvement in this election as being pro-Obama, I believe there has been a sharp increase in participation on the rural-conservative side as well. Just like in 2004, I have a feeling our side of New Mexico could make a difference in overcoming the urban-liberal-Albuquerque-Santa Fe side -- ultimately giving McCain our 5 electoral votes. We are being overlooked, and the polls in this state don't seem to be that great. For one thing, there aren't enough of them, and I haven't been called a single time!
 
So i'm boldly predicting a close McCain win in NM, based on the quiet, confident enthusiasm for McCain-Palin in the rural areas -- and for defeat of the most left-wing Democrat that party has run in recent years.
 
Another group being overlooked, as Michael Medved wrote about recently, is values voters. I know first hand that these people will be going all out to defeat the blatently pro-abortion Obama platform.
 
One more lesson: A family member recently visited a very popular dentist office in my town --- every single employee was wearing McCain-Palin gear in clearly coordinated fashion during business hours. That, it seems to me, is real enthusiasm! I advise my liberal friends to avoid this dentist.  
 
Finally, about us folks on the rural side --- we don't care much for consdecending campaigns, expensive phoney ads, and media types telling us how it's gonna be.
 
Go McCain-Palin!

USA! USA! USA!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

OBAMA! AS SEEN ON TV!!!

Obama -- usually one for promising the "change" so many Americans want -- is instead bringing you more of something most Americans hate...COMMERCIALS! And as if 100 cheesy Obama political ads per hour weren't enough...Obama now joins the ranks of "Hip Hop Abs", "OxyClean", and "Swivel Sweeper" in trying to sell you junk -- in this case, wealth redistribution -- all in the form of a 30 minute "infomercial." Worse yet, he's holding up a baseball game -- AMERICA'S PASTIME FOR CRYING OUT LOUD -- just so he can hear himself talk uninterrupted in prime time, and on 3 networks!
 
No doubt this will be a slick production. And in spite of the scam Obama will be selling, don't expect a Billy Mays-style presentation. Maybe ask, how would Ken Burns do an infomercial? It'll have great production values. At the very least -- we expect the production quality of one of the better PBS Pledge Drive breaks.
 
Nevertheless, after the Greek Columns, World Tour, and Pre-Presidential-Presidential Seal --- is it possible that all this might just backfire? Is it fair to ask -- in the middle of "the worst economy since the Great Depression" -- just how it is Obama can afford to buy an election? Some are raising the possibility of such backlash.
 
Robert Robb notes the following in Tuscon Citizen:
Obama purchasing a half-hour of prime-time television devoted to himself at this point in the campaign might be seen as an act of vanity. It also highlights that he turned down public financing, despite his pledge to accept it, which is why he can afford such an extravagance. And, at this point, what's Obama going to say that's new, that's not just a repetition of what everyone already knows?
Given where the campaign is right now, I think that the half-hour infomercial has more risks than potential rewards. (more)
and from my favorite observer of all things Pop-Culture and Political, Michael Medved:
If the public wants to say no to an arrogant front-runner, no to condescending commentators, and no to over-reliance on money in politics, there’s only one way to vote on November 4th
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Dangerous Threesome

I just watched a fired up John McCain deliver the most convincing and forceful case against an Obama + Pelosi + Reid. McCain named names and made it crystal-clear in his trademark "Straight Talk" style. McCain -- flanked by Michael Steele, Mitt Romney, Jack Kemp, and a few other business leaders and economic gurus -- reminded us that raising taxes in a bad economy will lead to disaster. McCain reminded us of Obama's willingness to raise taxes to pay for more spending. McCain reminded us that he is not George Bush when it comes to spending, but that Obama is not Bush because he wants to raise your taxes.
 
I'm very encouraged by McCain's fervor. He's fighting, and we should be as well. The race isn't over. I sense yet another comeback for Mac.
 
And he pressed the argument that Obama, combined with a solidly Democratic Congress led by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, would take spending out of control. "This is a dangerous threesome," he said
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Over? Nope. Trending Back for McCain

Don't believe the hype, the spin, the media, David Letterman, or the Obamunist propaganda cheerleading.
 
Stay strong, and like my hero John McCain says...FIGHT!
 
The latest from Reuters/C-Span/Zogby:
Obama leads McCain by 49 percent to 44 percent among likely U.S. voters in the daily tracking poll, which has a margin of error of 2.9 points. Obama's lead has dropped over the last three days after hitting a high of 12 points on Thursday.
 
"Things are trending back for McCain. His numbers are rising and Obama's are dropping on a daily basis. There seems to be a direct correlation between this and McCain talking about the economy," pollster John Zogby said.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

McCain Should Go Wright

Jeremiah Wright cannot win the election for John McCain, but a timely encore from the radical reverend might help sink Obama. The McCain campaign should reintroduce Wright to those "undecideds" who might have missed or fogotten about Obama's long time spiritual guide who, instead of humbly asking for God to bless America, screams "G--DAMN AMERICA!"
 
Apparently, John McCain himself says Wright is off limits. This was also the case earlier in the year, when McCain condemned a local Republican ad that tried to use Wright against a local democrat. In that case, McCain was right to ban the use of Wright. That ad was not even against Barack Obama directly, and made no logical sense. It was pure "guilt by association" to the furthest extreme, since the ad tried to tie the local democrat to Rev. Wright, someone the democrat had pobably never even met. In short, it was a stupid ad that made Republicans look stupid.
 
This is different. An attack using Wright is completely justified against Barack Obama himself. Voters deserve to know what Obama's longtime spiritual advisor is all about, and draw their own conclusions as to why Obama would choose to listen to this guy right up until his run for the Presidency. Does anyone really believe that Wright's offensive remarks, the ones we are most familiar with from news broadcasts, were a rare exception? Every time Wright opens his mouth, you can expect something anti-American, anti-Israel, and blatently racist. This is not a one time thing with Mr. Wright. Obama knows it, and should have to explain the relationship beyond the simple, lame excuse he's been allowed to get away with.
 
Similarly, it's difficult to believe Barack Obama when he suggests that he didn't know anything at all about Bill Ayers reputation as a violent Weather Undergroud radical. Really? Political Science at Columbia? Harvard? And the first time Barack Obama heard about Ayers bombing the Pentegon, trying to bomb Fort Dix, and the well-documented violent history of the Weather Underground itself was when Republicans brought it up in 2008? PLEASE! Barack Obama is a highly intelligent man -- who just happens to think everyone else is stupid enough to believe his excuses. Obama should be forced to explain.
 
And what about the guy that financed most of Obama's political career and helped him buy a nice big house for a sweet discount? That guy, Tony Rezko, corrupt Chicago slumlord, is on his way to jail.
 
And what about Obama's activities as a community organizer? Just how much positive "change" did Obama accomplish in the neighborhoods he supposedly was out to help? Can anyone seriously look at those miserable neighborhoods today and say that the unfortunate inhabitants are better off because of Obama's efforts? Is this the economic change we can expect Obama to offer the rest of the country?
 
This is not necessarily a character issue so much as it is about judgement.
 
What kind of judgement has Barack Obama displayed when he seeks out the advice and contributions of these despicable people? Is this the kind of judgement we need in a time of crisis -- economic or otherwise? 
 
Barack Obama has campaigned on bringing the country together, but has never displayed the willingness to reach beyond those who share to some degree his liberal and leftist ideology. He has practically no record of reaching out to Republicans -- yet seems unconcerned about his eagerness to reach out to those on the far left.
 
Voters deserve a thorough explanation from Obama -- in spite of his arrogant and visible annoyance whenever asked.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Not the Ken Burns I Liked

Ken Burns, brilliant director of "The War" shown on PBS last year, has written a very anti-McCain piece in the vein of "McCain isn't that Republican we thought was a liberal anymore, so now we like Obama because McCain is just like Bush, yada-yada-yada".
 
What drives me nuts, is that the piece is far below the intelligence of Mr. Burns, who's work I respect and admire. While I'm not at all surprised a liberal filmaker would support Obama, I'm shocked that Ken Burns would publish something under his name that looks like it was hastily penned by Axelrod himself. It merely repeats the sleaziest of Obama's most predictable talking points: McCain has a temper and is unstable, McCain is Bush, McCain has changed, etc. etc.
 
I was angry enough to write a response to the publisher. Since I have no idea if they'll publish it -- i'll just paste my comments here. Behold, the getting-off-your-chest-power of a personal blog! (thanks, Townhall)
 
My response to Ken Burns:

No surprises here, Ken Burns is voting for Obama. I would have expected, however, that such a talented and intelligent man would use something more than basic Obama campaign talking-points in a written piece.

McCain does not use his military record for blatent political gain -- review the Kerry '04 campaign for the best example of that behavior. McCain is not George W. Bush. The famous "McCain temper" has not turned up, in spite of blatent and pathetic Obama campaign efforts to bring it out.

McCain does, however,  want to win -- against a man who promised "hope", but who's first ad featured a blatent, out-of-context distortion of McCain's words at a townhall, suggesting that the former POW wanted 100 years of war. Let it also be clear that John McCain never withdrew his offer to host 10 joint townhalls with his opponent. They were to even fly on the same plane, in a further effort to change the political tone. Obama rejected, simply and callously, because his strength is behind a teleprompter.

John McCain has not changed, but he refuses to let Obama simply push him over. Perhaps you would like him better if he did.

There is plenty of dishonesty and spin from both sides, including Obama's. But don't begrudge McCain simply because the old warrior -- ever the underdog -- is proving himself once again a formidable fighter for the ideas and the country that he loves. 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Lamest Anti-Palin Joke to Date

Often, David Letterman's outdated, predictable, humorless show is on a certain TV in our house, at the request of an elderly relative who likes to reminisce about the days when Dave was funny. In great anticipation of the comedic brilliance this loved one has come to expect from Letterman -- this dear relative falls asleep exactly two seconds after Paul finishes the intro song.
 
It's because of this that I endure, night after night, Letterman's extreme Bush Derangement Syndrome, Obama-worship, McCain-bashing, and Palin-hating routine that now substitutes for the brilliant comedy he was once known for too many years ago.
What is pathetic about Letterman is that to this very day, he refuses --- absolutely refuses --- to make a single joke disparaging towards Obama. Meanwhile, McCain is fair game, especially if it has to do with his age. Palin is also fair game, of course, and it's clear that Letterman actually hates this woman.
 
So, on any given night, it's a guarantee that instead of laughs, Letterman will spew venomous one-sided "jokes" about Palin, McCain, Republicans, and Bush --- but nothing about Obama or even Biden. The bias is so obvious and intentional, that it's absolutely clear that Letterman considers any joke about Obama to be nothing less than sacrilege.
 
Aside from the worries this raises about Letterman's mental condition, this situation has also led to a further decline in the comedic standards of the show. For instance, a while back, Letterman delivered this "joke" about McCain's age (of course):
 
"McCain played horseshoes this weekend."
 
Yes, that was the joke. Keep in mind that Letterman is getting paid 30-plus million a year to churn out this gold.
 
Tonight, in an astonishing display of complete out-of-touch ignorance, Letterman put this in his Top Ten List about Palin, something like:
 
"Palin is Mitt Romney in a wig"    
 
It needs to be explained to anyone who isn't a Letterman staffer that, yes, that was indeed a joke. Predictably, Mitt Romney was a favorite target for Letterman, so it makes sense that he somehow try to connect his hatred of him with Palin. What the "joke" means, I guess, is that Mitt Romney was pretty, and so is Palin? Hmmmm.
 
While Letterman clearly wishes Mitt Romney were still around to kick, he feels he can treat Palin the same way. But his attacks will be inconsistent and stupid, if this is how he chooses to do it, because "good looks" is exactly where any similarity between Palin and Romney end.
 
Fair or not, Romney simply could not connect well with the American people. Palin clearly can. Romney is the stereotype of the "evil" rich corporate un-caring Republican, again, fair or not. Palin is solidly, undeniably working-class. Romney came off as kind of a phoney. Palin is as genuine as it gets.
 
Letterman -- his midwest roots completely dead and replaced with Manhattan elitism -- will never, ever get it. The mainstream media will never get it. Tonight, Palin won her debate against Joe Biden, because she once again connected with the American people. It matters little to Letterman, and others who feel their presence in front of a network television camera somehow gives them special wisdom. He taped tonight's show hours before the debate, no doubt anticipating a poor performance by Palin.
 
He was wrong, but he'll never know it, or admit it.
 
If Letterman ever decided to go back to being funny instead of trying to win critical acclaim, he could start by refusing to be the left-wing tool his is now, add some good Obama jokes to his McCain material, stop his creepy reverence for Obama, and cool his burning, seething hatred of Sarah Palin.   
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Can McCain Make the Economy His Issue?

John McCain still has an opportunity to take "the economy" as an issue away from Obama, though he failed to do so last week and at the first debate.
 
I applaud McCain for acknowledging who he works for last week, halting his campaign activities, and getting back to work to do the job we pay him to do. Oppositely, Barack Obama clearly believes we actually pay him to campaign -- evidenced by his just-under-the-surface annoyance at the mere suggestion that he and McCain get back to work during the crisis, as well as his total lack of accomplishment in his Senate term -- which he used only as a platform to campaign. For putting his duty, responsibility, and country before politics -- McCain deserves credit where Obama should get none.
 
Back to reality. The bailout failed, and McCain's numbers are sinking fast. Instead of doing what Newt Gingrich, Dick Morris, even Mike Huckabee suggested, McCain went to the debate having not forcefully spoken against putting taxpayers on the hook for a perceived $700 billion -- BILLION! -- bailout, the unpopular Bush administration, and partisan liberal democrats. Instead of going into the debate as a "Maverick", McCain played the part of the boring (though "bi-partisan") Washington insider at best -- campaign stunt-meister at worst.
 
At the debate, McCain handily won the foreign policy part, but it's clear that he is unprepared to effectivley make the case on the economy. Still, some opportunities exist in the midst of chaos.
 
My Advice (for McCain) Follows: 
 
Disclaimer: I have no clue about political science, and not much of a clue on economic crisis, but screw it -- nobody else seems to know what to do either, let alone our very leaders, so here goes:
  • McCain needs to figure out a way to get credit for trying to improve a bill from one that was deeply flawed and costly, into one that was far less expensive and less socialist
  • McCain needs to point out that he at least contributed to the effort, while Obama again voted "present" and whined the whole time because it took him away from his precious campaign
  • McCain needs to be clear that he is against a bill loaded with bailouts and corporate welfare to reward incompetent rich guys (again -- $700 BILLION!!!)
  • Instead, McCain should favor insurance, and/or a way that American taxpayers have a chance to possibly get their money back and then some for the loan they're being asked to give to save the system
  • The bill should contain absolutely NO SELFISH OPPORTUNISTIC EARMARKS! NONE!!
  • The bill should be crafted in TOTAL TRANSPARENCY to every American, posted on the internet, as Rush Limbaugh and Gingrich have suggested
  • McCain should remind us of the disaster Barack Obama will bring to the economy via his huge, crippling capital gains tax hikes. Obama's tax and spend plan will guarantee a DEPRESSION if implemented in this economic climate.
  • McCain needs to make the case for his tax cuts and lower corporate tax rates as a way to jump start the economy, and put it on the path to long term growth, a real plan to get out of the rut
  • McCain needs to get confident and bossy about this stuff, like he did during the surge
  • Obama needs to be called on his eagerness to gain politically from the suffering of the American people, while not lifting a finger to do anything except run his mouth 

AD IDEA: Voiceover: The Country in economic crisis. What does Barack Obama offer? Talk. Blame. Inaction. Nothing. He believes you pay him to campaign, all while demanding even higher taxes...etc. etc. etc. Obama: Dangerous. Not ready.

Again, McCain has a chance to blast both the un-popular administration, even more unpopular "bailout", as well as the partisan losers in Washington. He can offer an alternative of transparency, straight talk, and OPTIMISM. 

I hope -- for the sake of the country he loves so much -- that McCain learns quickly how to make his case for the economy, with the same fervor and determination he did for the surge.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Grandstanding?

John McCain has been accused of "grandstanding" for hastily shutting down his campaign to get to work on the financial crisis. The criticism comes not just from the left. On The Michael Medved Show recently, free market advocate Amity Shlaes indicated her belief that McCain's actions were alarmist, and ultimately bad for the troubled market.
 
From a perspective that is strictly concerned with the market, Mrs. Shlaes has a point -- but she's missing the larger point about McCain's actions and what they say.
 
As Medved pointed out, both Obama and McCain are sitting Senators (neither has resigned) who continue to draw a salary. Essentially, they are still "on the clock" -- and should be expected to do their job, regardless of a political campaign.
 
What should be more of a shock is not what McCain did, but the very fact that what he did was enough to raise eyebrows at all. Why should it be a surprise for a sitting Senator to put a political campaign on hold for a few hours to do some work? Are we paying Senator McCain and Obama to campaign all day? Of course not! They are paid to serve the public, and we should expect them to place that priority ahead of politics, especially during a crisis.
 
Instead, McCain's actions come as a shock because we have sadly come to expect our politicians to be politicians first -- and servants second.
 
By calling for a temporary end to politics in order to do what we pay him to do, McCain has taken the lead in not only highlighting exactly what's wrong with American government these days, but showing why he is the right candidate to change this sad state of affairs.
 
Obama, in contrast, said to us "call me if you need me." Suddenly, all the criticism Obama gets for voting "present" so many times, for essentially having run for President instead of working on behalf of the public during the majority of his short senate term, is crystalized. It would appear that Mr. Obama actually does believe that we pay him to run a full time campaign, and that even after all of his alarmist rhetoric about the seriousness of the economic situation, it really amounts to an inconvenience for him when it's time to act. For Obama -- sure, the economy may be in crisis, but he's got a debate to prepare for.
 
Despite his short time in Washington, it has not taken very long at all for Mr. Obama to adopt the very attitude that has corrupted our government, and completely destroyed all trust in our leaders.  
 
This "politics first" view is exactly what needs to be reformed in Washington, and McCain as shown that he and Governor Palin are exactly the types who will not just talk about the change we need -- but actually bring it.

It's refreshing to see at least one candidate willing to back up their campaign slogan with action. Country First!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous12345Next »